IMMIGRATION: WHAT THE PUBLIC OPINION
POLLS SAY
1) The Gallup Poll of June, 1987 found
Canadians overwhelmingly opposed to immigration that would upset Canada's
ethnic balance.
- Do you ... think the size and content of immigration should be permitted
to change our ethnic and cultural balance?
-YES: 22.4%; NO:
77.6%.
-Would you or would you not favour a policy where the main selection
of immigrants is made from countries with cultures similar to Canada's
to ensure compatability and integration?
- YES: 52.7%; NO:
47.3%
-Absorptive capacity is the rate of immigration a country can absorb
without dramatically changing its population composition and nature. Do
you or do you not favour adopting an absorptive capacity policy for Canada?
-YES: 76.3%; NO:
23.7%
(Globe and Mail, September 17, 1987)
2. -Most Canadians believe there are "too many immigrants,"
especially from visible minorities, according to a new survey commissioned
for the federal government. Four in 10 Canadians believe there are too
many members of visible minorities, singling out Arabs, blacks and Asians.
... And in Toronto, where the largest number of immigrants to Canada live,
the survey showed a startling rise recently in intolerant attitudes. About
67 percent of the respondents in Canada's largest city said there were
too many immigrants, compared with 46 percent just two years ago. In the
poll, conducted [in February] by Ottawa-based Ekos
Research Associates Inc., 53 per cent of Canadians questioned immigration
levels, compared with 44 per cent two years ago. ... [Only] 7 percent said
there were two few immigrants in Canada. (Globe and
Mail, March 10, 1994)
3. A June, 1994 poll, commissioned by the Immigration
Association of Canada and conducted by Forum Canada Research confirmed
a host of other polls that continue to show ongoing opposition by the Canadian
Majority to the current immigration policy. Respondents were asked:
-The Federal government plans to accept 250,000 immigrants to Canada
in 1994. In your opinion, it this too many, too few or about right?
A total of 60.3 per cent said too many; a mere 1.6 per cent said too
few.
Another question asked:
-Would you approve or disapprove of a proposal to place restrictions
on the entry of immigrant workers who may compete with unemployed Canadians
for jobs during periods of high unemployment?
Fully 66.3 per cent approved of such a proposal.
A tightening of the much abused family reunification track won wide
support.
-Currently the majority of immigrants coming to Canada are sponsored
by relatives living here. Would you approve or disapprove if sponsorship
was restricted to immediate dependent family members, such as husbands,
wives, and unmarried children?
A strong majority -- 69.2 per cent approved.
Currently, people with AIDS, tuberculosis, pernicious Hepatitis B,
and even leprosy somehow manage to get into Canada. Actually, we don't
even test for AIDS. A runaway majority say this must change. When asked,
-Do you think people with incurable contagious diseases should or should
not be permitted to immigrate to Canada?
77.1 per cent said they should be kept out.
When Asked
-Should elderly persons who do not subscribe to medical health programmes
that are valid in Canada and who may become a burden on medicare, be permitted
to immigrate to Canada?
A solid 61 per cent said no.
Canada still seems to grant refugee or landed immigrant status to a
depressing number of people with criminal records. The majority view is
crystal clear. Asked,
-Should persons with criminal records, or those with terrorist or anti-democratic
backgrounds be permitted to immigrate to Canada?
An overwhelming 95.9 per cent of respondents said no.
Finally, when asked about the government's wimpy policy of granting
permanent residence to illegals -who had claimed refugee status on entry,
but who were declared ineligible for this status after complete judicial
reviews, 64.1 per cent said they disapproved of such a policy. (Calgary
Herald, August 4, 1994)
Columnist Doug Fisher (Calgary Sun, July 13,
1994) reflected on the highly undemocratic nature of Canada's immigration
policy.
"If immigration policy and levels were set by the opinion polls
of the past decade, they would be markedly different in two regards. Indeed,
their implementation would make Marchi bail out of office shouting 'racism.'
The opinions are plain and blunt. First, most Canadians favour less immigration.
They think a quarter of a million a year is too high. This goal was set
in the late 1980s and is stoutly defended by Marchi. Second and more shocking,
most Canadians prefer immigrants from Europe, particularly the U.K., and
would like fewer -- far fewer -- from the Caribbean, Africa, Latin America
and Asia."
And still on public opinion polls. Canadians are not jumping up and
down with glee at the prospect of an influx of Cubans. On August 29, the
Toronto Star's phone-in question was:
-Should Canada open its doors to Cuban immigrants? A crushing 87 per
cent said no. (Toronto Star, September 1, 1994)
4. -Ellen Gee, a sociologist at Simon Fraser
University ..., said the changes in immigration patterns have taken
place so rapidly that the result is a recipe for social unease. "Survey
after survey shows that people are negative about immigrants. I'm very
pessimistic. ... Prof. Gee said opinion surveys consistently show the public
disapproves of immigrants, particularly in the large urban areas that receive
most of them." (Globe and Mail, December 9,
1992)
5. -Confidential government documents suggest Canadians are becoming
increasingly hostile -- if not racist -- towards immigration. The document
prepared by senior immigration officials say internal government polling
shows "attitudes to immigration levels appear to be hardening, with
significantly more Canadians feeling there are too many immigrants coming
to Canada." The confidential government survey found fully half of
those Canadians polled in the past year were either intolerant or outright
'xenophones'. ... Only 14 per cent were listed as compassionate."
Moreover, senior government officials warn: "Canadians seriously underestimate
the number of immigrants arriving annually." (Ottawa
Citizen, December 9, 1993)
6. A Gallup Poll commissioned by Zero Population
Growth (Canada) in the spring of 1981 found: 60.2% of Canadians
felt Canadian population shoulds remain at its then present level of 24
million; only 16.5% wished to see the population larger than 30-million;
31.7% wanted no immigration at all; 65.1% wanted less than 50,000 immigrants
pe year; only 15.3% preferred more than 100,000 immigrants per year at
a time when the average annual level was 130,000.
7. A Globe-Environics Poll taken in March,
1987 found that 65% of Canadians feel there is too much immigration. (Globe
and Mail, June 6, 1987)
8. In May, 1987, Goldfarb Consultants of Toronto
found thar 83% of Canadians supported the tightening of regulations for
the admission of so-called refugees. Only a tiny 11% wanted an open-door
refugee policy. (Toronto Star, June 3, 1987)
9. Another Environics Poll found that
70% of Canadians were opposed to the idea of immigration. (Globe
and Mail, March 6, 1987)
10. A Gallup Poll released in mid-October, 1991 revealed that a mere
17 per cent of Canadians wanted immigration levels increased. (Toronto
Sun, October 21, 1990) Nevertheless, when then-Immigration Minister
Barbara MacDougall rose in Parliament, October 25, to announce the government's
new five-year plan, immigration was hiked to 220,000 in 1991 and 250,000
for each of the next four years.
11. -Almost six Canadians in 10 express at least some reservations
about the number of immigrants to Canada, a poll for the federal immigration
department indicates. (Toronto Star, August 19, 1996)
Interestingly, the Star had to winkle this taxpayer-funded poll out of
the government through an Access to Information Act request.
- Forty-six per cent of respondents said there are too
many immigrants coming to Canada. ... Forty-two per cent said immigration
levels are about right, ... but some respondents who initially said the
number of immigrans is about right subsequently said there may be "a
little too many." "This suggests that ... concerns about the
level of immigration may be (and have been, in earlier surveys) more widespread
than one would think in light of responses to the initial question, said
a memo to the minister."
- The Angus-Reid poll found
Canadians resistant to a number of other attitudes fostered by the immigration
industry.
- Fifty-four per cent said immigration increases unemployment,
while 29 per cent said it has no effect, and 15 per cent think it reduces
unemployment. So much for people buying the governments immigrants-create-jobs
party line!
- Six out of 10 said children born to those moving permanently
to another country should not automatically be given Canadian citizenship.
Support for that view rises to 80 per cent when it comes to grandchildren.
- Sixty-three per cent rejected granting citizenship automatically
to any child born on Canadian soil, regardless of whether their parents
are Canadian.
12.-Most Canadians want ethnic minorities to adapt to the value system
and the "Canadian way of life" of the majority, a survey on race
relations says. ..."Many Canadians want Ottawa to spend less on multiculturalism,
particularly funding for ethnic festivals and celebrations. These were
among the findings of the Canadian Council of Christians and Jews' latest
survey. ... Seventy-seven per cent also said ethnic minorities should try
to adapt to a Canadian way of life, rather than holding on to their cultural
differences." (Toronto Star, April 13, 1995)
Naturally, the multicultural cheerleaders tried to put the best shine
on the bad news. "But the survey didn't define what it considered
to be the 'value system' or the 'way of life' of the majority and that
is part of the poll's weakness, said Karen Mock, national director of the
League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith. Michael Sullivan of Decima Research,
which conducted the survey, said Canadians seem to be yearning to move
away from the traditional notion of the Canadian mosaic toward an American-style
melting pot. And many Canadians seem to want to see a change in government
multiculturalism policies. Forty-five per cent want to see Ottawa decrease
the current $25-million it spends on multiculturalism. ... There was an
even split on the issue of immigration policy. Forty-six per cent of those
surveyed believed that too many people of different races and cultures
are being allowed into Canada and an equal percentage felt there was a
good balance of people from various backgrounds coming into Canada."
13.-Almost 60 per cent of Canadians support a five-year ban on new
immigrants coming to Canada, says a Forum Canada
Research poll. Forum Canada president Lorne Bozinoff, who conducted
the poll for the Immigration Association of Canada ... said: "The
results of the poll are pretty self-evident on how Canadians feel about
immigration right now." (Toronto Sun, May 16,
1995) The poll conducted in March is all provinces except Quebec
asked respondents -if they approve or disapprove of a five-year suspension
of all immigration to provide time for Canada to integrate the large number
of immigrants who have entered Canada in recent years. The approval rate
was 58.9 per cent. Immigration Association President Kim Abbott said the
statistics show the government needs to step back and review the high numbers
of immigrants it is letting into Canada. Last fall, the government set
its immigration level between 190,000 and 215,000 for this year. ... Abbott
says the poll also shows 'dangers' in the government's decision to continue
to finance immigrants to maintain their culture and lifestyles in Canada.
... The poll also revealed:
- 73.8 per cent thought any savings from the moratorium
on immigration should be spent on creating jobs for Canadians.
- 50.9 per cent thought that civil servants and not political
appointees should determine refugee status.
- 75.7 per cent think those found not to be refugees should
be turned away at the border.